4.4 Article

Wt1 and β-catenin cooperatively regulate diaphragm development in the mouse

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 407, Issue 1, Pages 40-56

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.08.009

Keywords

Wt1; beta-catenin; Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia; Wnt signaling; Diaphragm development; Mesothelium

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, United States [R01 HL085459]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The developing diaphragm consists of various differentiating cell types, many of which are not well characterized during organogenesis. One important but incompletely understood tissue, the diaphragmatic mesothelium, is distinctively present from early stages of development. Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia (CDH) occurs in humans when diaphragm tissue is lost during development, resulting in high morbidity and mortality postnatally. We utilized a Wilms Tumor 1 (Wt1) mutant mouse model to investigate the involvement of the mesothelium in normal diaphragm signaling and development. Additionally, we developed and characterized a Wt1(CreERT2)-driven beta-catenin loss-of-function model of CDH after finding that canonical Wnt signaling and beta-catenin are reduced in WO mutant mesothelium. Mice with beta-catenin loss or constitutive activation induced in the Wt1 lineage are only affected when tamoxifen injection occurs between E10.5 and E11.5, revealing a critical time-frame for Wt1/ beta-catenin activity. Conditional beta-catenin loss phenocopies the Wt1 mutant diaphragm defect, while constitutive activation of beta-catenin on the Wt1 mutant background is sufficient to close the diaphragm defect. Proliferation and apoptosis are affected, but primarily these genetic manipulations appear to lead to a change in normal diaphragm differentiation. Our data suggest a fundamental role for mesothelial signaling in proper formation of the diaphragm. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available