4.4 Article

Econometric modelling of multiple self-reports of health states: The switch from EQ-5D-3L to EQ-5D-51, in evaluating drug therapies for rheumatoid arthritis

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS
Volume 55, Issue -, Pages 139-152

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2017.06.013

Keywords

EQ-5D; Ordinal response; Copula; Mixture models; Rheumatoid arthritis; Mapping; Cost-effectiveness

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [MR/L022575/1]
  2. ESRC funding through the Understanding Society project
  3. Centre for Micro -Social Change [ES/K005146/1, ES/L009153/1]
  4. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/L009153/1, ES/H00811X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Medical Research Council [MR/L022575/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. ESRC [ES/L009153/1, ES/H00811X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. MRC [MR/L022575/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

EQ-5D is used in cost-effectiveness studies underlying many important health policy decisions. It comprises a survey instrument describing health states across five domains, and a system of utility values for each state. The original 3-level version of EQ-5D is being replaced with a more sensitive 5-level version but the consequences of this change are uncertain. We develop a multi -equation ordinal response model incorporating a copula specification with normal mixture marginals to analyse joint responses to EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in a survey of people with rheumatic disease, and use it to generate mappings between the alternative descriptive systems. We revisit a major cost-effectiveness study of drug therapies for rheumatoid arthritis, mapping the original EQ-5D-3L measure onto a 5L valuation basis. Working within a comprehensive, flexible econometric framework, we find that use of simpler restricted specifications can make very large changes to cost-effectiveness estimates with serious implications for decision-making. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available