4.7 Article

Methane explosion suppression characteristics based on the NaHCO3/red-mud composite powders with core-shell structure

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 335, Issue -, Pages 84-91

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.04.031

Keywords

NaHCO3/red-mud composite; Methane; Explosion suppression; Core-shell structure

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51504083, 51404097, 51674104, U1361205, 51574111]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M592290]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Universities of Henan Province [NSFRF1606]
  4. Program for Science & Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan Province [17HASTIT029]
  5. Program for Innovative Research Team in University of Ministry of Education of China [IRT-16R22]
  6. Foundation for Distinguished Young Scientists of Henan Polytechnic University [J2016-2, J2017-3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The NaHCO3/red-mud (RM) composite powders were successfully prepared by the solvent-anti-solvent method for methane explosion suppression. The RM was used as a carrier, and the NaHCO3 was used as a loaded inhibitor. The NaHCO3/RM composite powders showed a special core-shell structure and excellent endothermic performance. The suppression properties of NaHCO3/RM composite for 9.5% CH4 explosion were tested in a 20 L spherical explosion vessel and a 5 L Perspex duct. The results showed that the NaHCO3/RM composite powders displayed a much better suppression property than the pure RM or NaHCO3 powders. The loading amount of NaHCO3 has an intensive influence on the inhibition property of NaHCO3/RM composite powders. The best loaded content of NaHCO3 is 35%. It exhibited significant inhibitory effect that the explosion max-pressure declined 44.9%, the max-pressure rise rate declined 963% and the pressure peak time delayed 366.7%, respectively. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available