4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Fate and mass balance of triclosan and its degradation products: Comparison of three different types of wastewater treatments and aerobic/anaerobic sludge digestion

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 323, Issue -, Pages 329-340

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.04.034

Keywords

Triclosan; Sewage treatment plant; Mass balance; 2,4-Dicholorophenol; 2,8-Dichlorodibenzoparadioxin; Distribution coefficient; Biodegradation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Triclosan (TCS) as an antimicrobial agent has been ubiquitously found in wastewater and sewage sludge. TCS may undergo transformation/degradation during wastewater treatment. Some of the resulted products such as 2,4-dichlorophenol (2,4-DCP), 2,8-dichlorodibenzoparadioxin (2,8-DCDD) and methyl triclosan (MTCS) are presumed toxic/persistent compounds. In this study, fate ofTCS and the probability of formation of important degradation products were investigated in three susceptible wastewater/sludge treatment practices. 24.1% and 27.2% of the loading TCS was adsorbed to the generated sludge, whereas up to 60% of the loading TCS was biotransformed. Up to 9.9% and 13.0% of TCS loss was attributed to the formation of 2,4-DCP and 2,8-DCDD in chlorination and UV disinfection, respectively. Anaerobic and aerobic sludge digestion processes eliminated up to 23.0% and 56.0% of TCS, respectively. About 7.4% of TCS in aerobic digestion was transformed to methyl triclosan (MTCS). Significant temporal variation of TCS was observed in primary sedimentations, except for chemically enhanced primary treatment that was suggested to be governed by chemical-forced sedimentation. Distribution coefficient (K-d) of TCS was directly correlated to the total organic carbon of the sludge (TOC). Moreover, strong correlation was observed between elimination efficiency in primary sedimentation and loading concentration. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available