4.7 Article

Volatile compounds emission and health risk assessment during composting of organic fraction of municipal solid waste

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 327, Issue -, Pages 35-43

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.11.046

Keywords

Composting; Volatile compounds; MSOF; GC-MS; Health risk

Funding

  1. Special Fund of Environmental Protection Research for Public Welfare, Ministry of Environmental Protection, P. R. China [201209022]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41101225]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Degradation of mechanically sorted organic fraction (MSOF) of municipal solid waste in composting facilities is among the major contributors of volatile compounds (VCs) generation and emission, causes nuisance problems and health risks on site as well as in the vicinages. The aim of current study was to determine the seasonal (summer and winter) variation and human health risk assessment of VCs in the ambient air of different processing units in MSOF at composting plant in China. Average concentration of VCs was 58.50 and 138.03 mg/m(3) in summer and winter respectively. Oxygenated compounds were found to be the highest concentration (46.78-91.89 mg/m(3)) with ethyl alcohol as the major specie (43.90-85.31 mg/m(3)) in the two seasons respectively. Nevertheless, individual non-carcinogenic (Hazard relation i.e HR < 1) and carcinogenic risk (CR < 1.0E-04) of the quantified VCs were within acceptable limit except naphthalene at biofilter unit. In addition, cumulative non-carcinogenic risk exceeded from the threshold limit both in summers and winters in all units except at biofilter unit during winter. Furthermore cumulative carcinogenic risk also exceeded at same unit during the summer season. Therefore special attention should be made to minimize cumulative non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risk as people are well exposed to mixture of compounds, not to individual. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available