4.7 Article

Removal of Cu(II) ions from contaminated waters using a conducting microfiltration membrane

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 339, Issue -, Pages 182-190

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.06.038

Keywords

Conducting membrane; Cu(II); Electrochemical process; Membrane separation; Wastewater treatment

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51422811, 51678423]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Efficient removal of toxic metals using low-pressure membrane processes from contaminated waters is an important but challenging task. In the present work, a conducting microfiltration membrane prepared by embedding a stainless steel mesh in the active layer of a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane is developed to remove Cu(II) ions from contaminated waters. Results showed that the conducting membrane had favorable electrochemical properties and stability as cathode. Batch tests showed that Cu(II) removal efficiency increased with the increase of voltages and leveled off with the further enhancement of electric field. The optimal voltages were determined to be 1.0 V and 2.0 V for the influent Cu(II) concentrations of 5 mg/L and 30 mg/L, respectively. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction results demonstrated the presence of Cu(0) and Cu(OH)2 on the membrane surface. The removal mechanisms involved the intrinsic adsorption of membrane, electrosorption of membrane, adsorption of deposited layer, chemical precipitation of Cu(OH)2 and deposition of Cu(0) which were aided by electrophoresis and electrochemical oxidation-reduction. Long-term tests showed that the major contributors for Cu(II) removal were the deposition of Cu(0) by electrochemical reduction-oxidation (473%+/- 8.5%) and chemical precipitation (41.1%+/- 0.2%), followed by electrosorption, adsorption by the fouling layer and membrane intrinsic sorption. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available