4.2 Article

The Effects of Autologous Platelet-Rich Fibrin on Flexor Tendon Healing in a Rabbit Model

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME
Volume 42, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.06.098

Keywords

Flexor tendon healing; platelet-rich fibrin; platelet concentrates; tendon repair

Funding

  1. National University Health System, Singapore

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Platelet-rich plasma containing large amounts of growth factors is purported to increase repaired flexor tendon strength. However, the use of bovine thrombin has the risk of antibody formation. We evaluated the effects of the newer generation autologous platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) on flexor tendon healing. Methods We performed surgical repair of 32 flexor tendons from the index and ring digits of the hind paws of 8 New Zealand white rabbits. In the PRF group, the PRF membrane was either wrapped around or interposed between the repair sites. At 3 weeks after surgery, the tested tendons were subjected to range of motion analysis, cross-sectional area measurement, biomechanics testing, and histological analysis. Results The results showed no significant increase in range of motion in the PRF group compared with the control group, but there was a significant increase in cross-sectional area of the tendons in the PRF group. The biomechanical testing suggested that the control had a higher load to failure and stress to failure but similar stiffness and modulus to the PRF group. Conclusions The PRF did not have a major influence on cellular organization. It also had an undesirable effect on the biomechanical properties of repaired flexor tendons. Clinical relevance The findings of this study suggest PRF may, in certain situations, hinder rather than enhance, the healing for repaired flexor tendons. Copyright (C) 2017 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available