4.3 Article

Acoustic deterrence of bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) to a broadband sound stimulus

Journal

JOURNAL OF GREAT LAKES RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 163-171

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2016.11.009

Keywords

Bighead carp; Broadband sound; Bioacoustics; Acoustic deterrent

Funding

  1. Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund [101-D]
  2. US Environmental Protection Agency's Great Lakes Restoration Initiative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies have shown the potential of acoustic deterrents against invasive silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix). This study examined the phonotaxic response of the bighead carp (H. nobilis) to pure tones (500-2000 Hz) and playbacks of broadband sound from an underwater recording of a 100 hp outboard motor (0.06-10 kHz) in an outdoor concrete pond (10 x 5 x 1.2 m) at the U.S. Geological Survey Upper Midwest Environmental Science Center in La Crosse, WI. The number of consecutive times the fish reacted to sound from alternating locations at each end of the pond was assessed. Bighead carp were relatively indifferent to the pure tones with median consecutive responses ranging from 0 to 2 reactions away from the sound source. However, fish consistently exhibited significantly (P < 0.001) greater negative phonotaxis to the broadband sound (outboard motor recording) with an overall median response of 20 consecutive reactions during the 10 min trials. In over 50% of broadband sound tests, carp were still reacting to the stimulus at the end of the trial, implying that fish were not habituating to the sound. This study suggests that broadband sound may be an effective deterrent to bighead carp and provides a basis for conducting studies with wild fish. (C) 2016 International Association for Great Lakes Research. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available