4.4 Article

Ground-penetrating radar measurements of debris thickness on Lirung Glacier, Nepal

Journal

JOURNAL OF GLACIOLOGY
Volume 63, Issue 239, Pages 543-555

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jog.2017.18

Keywords

debris-covered glaciers; debris thickness; ground-penetrating radar; supraglacial debris

Funding

  1. NERC DTP grant [NE/L002507/1]
  2. Reynolds International Ltd
  3. BB Roberts Fund
  4. St Catharine's College Research Fund
  5. NERC Geophysical Equipment Facility grant [1014]
  6. University Travel Fund
  7. Natural Environment Research Council [1515307, NE/R000107/1, bas0100034] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. NERC [bas0100034, NE/R000107/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Supraglacial debris thickness is a key control on the surface energy balance of debris-covered glaciers, yet debris thickness measurements are sparse due to difficulties of data collection. Here we use ground-penetrating radar (GPR) to measure debris thickness on the ablation zone of Lirung Glacier, Nepal. We observe a strong, continuous reflection, which we interpret as the ice surface, through debris layers of 0.1 to at least 2.3 m thick, provided that appropriate acquisition parameters were used while surveying. GPR measurements of debris thickness correlate well with pit measurements of debris thickness (r = 0.91, RMSE = 0.04 m) and two-way travel times are consistent at tie points (r = 0.97). 33% of measurements are <0.5 m, so sub-debris melting is likely important in terms of mass loss on the debris-covered tongue and debris thickness is highly variable over small spatial scales (of order 10 m), likely due to local slope processes. GPR can be used to make debris thickness measurements more quickly, over a wider debris thickness range, and at higher spatial resolution than any other means and is therefore a valuable tool with which to map debris thickness distribution on Himalayan glaciers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available