4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Drinking water nitrate estimation at household-level in Danish population-based long-term epidemiologic studies

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOCHEMICAL EXPLORATION
Volume 183, Issue -, Pages 178-186

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2017.03.006

Keywords

Drinking water; Exposure; Nitrate; Denmark

Funding

  1. Innovation Fund Denmark
  2. Centre for Integrated Register-based Research at Aarhus University (CIRRAU)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents an approach making drinking water quality data from the Danish national geodatabase Jupiter available for epidemiological studies on long-term health effects of drinking water quality. Drinking water quality was assigned to all Danish households using spatial methods, and the related uncertainty due to sampling density was identified. Nitrate was used as an example contaminant. From 1978, 98% of all Danish households were geocoded with their precise location, yielding a total of 69 million evaluated household-years. Households supplied by a private well (4% of all household-years) were identified; the remaining majority was supplied by public waterworks. Water supply areas were connected to the Jupiter geodatabase to estimate drinking water quality at publicly supplied households. For privately supplied households, the exposure estimate had a substantially higher uncertainty, with 52% of household-years never being sampled, compared with 1% of publicly supplied household-years. For the 18% of all household-years with no nitrate samples, concentrations were estimated by interpolation and an uncertainty score based on the closest nitrate measurement was introduced. While nitrate was used as an example contaminant, the proposed approach is generic and can be used for all monitored drinking water parameters, after preprocessing and validation of the specific data and assumptions. (c) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available