4.6 Review

Transarterial chemoembolization prior to liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 7, Pages 1286-1294

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jgh.13727

Keywords

chemoembolization; hepatocellular carcinoma; liver transplantation; meta-analysis; transarterial

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and AimA debate exists over whether using preoperative transarterial chemoembolization for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation. Numerous studies have been investigating on this, but there is still no unanimous conclusion about the effect of preoperative transarterial chemoembolization. We conducted the meta-analysis of all available studies to systematically evaluate the influence of preoperative transarterial chemoembolization on liver transplant. MethodsA systematic search was performed by two authors (Si TF. and Guan RY.) through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Science Citation Index Expanded, combined with Manual Retrieval and Cited Reference Search. The searching cut-off date was 2016/07/31, and all the data obtained were statistically analyzed using Review Manager version 5.1 software (Copenhagen, The Nordic Cochrane Center, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011) recommended by Cochrane Collaboration. ResultsThe study showed that there was no difference between the experimental group and the control group on perioperative mortality (RR=1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI)=[0.49-2.48], P=0.82) or biliary complications (RR=0.96, 95%CI=[0.66-1.39], P=0.83). Preoperative transarterial chemoembolization had no obvious effect on improving overall survival (HR=1.05, 95%CI=[0.65-1.72], P=0. 83) but would result in a higher rate of vascular complications (RR=2.01, 95%CI=[1.23-3.27], P=0.005) and a reduction of disease free survival (HR=1.66, 95%CI=[1.02-2.70], P=0.04). Subgroup analysis also revealed that patients from transarterial chemoembolization group in Asia had a much lower overall survival rate (HR=2.65, 95%CI=[1.49-4.71], P=0.0009) compared with the control group. ConclusionsConsidering the possible adverse impacts on liver transplantation and the variation in sensitivity to transarterial chemoembolization, clinicians should be more cautious when considering transarterial chemoembolization as the bridging therapy for patients in the waiting list.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available