3.8 Proceedings Paper

Combining remote sensing data and ecosystem modeling to map rooting depth

Publisher

SPIE-INT SOC OPTICAL ENGINEERING
DOI: 10.1117/12.2532536

Keywords

rooting depth; GPP; Spain; Biome-BGC; PEM; MODIS; SEVIRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biogeochemical ecosystem models describe the energy and mass exchange processes between natural systems and their environment. They normally require a large amount of inputs that present important spatial variations and require a parameterization. Other simpler ecosystem models focused on a single process only need a reduced amount of inputs usually derived from direct measurements and can be combined with the former models to calibrate their parameters. This study combines the biogeochemical model Biome-BGC and a production efficiency model (PEM) optimized for the study area to calibrate a key parameter for the simulation of the ecosystem water balance by Biome-BGC, the rooting depth. Daily gross primary production (GPP) time series for the 2005-2012 period are simulated by both models. First, the optimized PEM is validated against GPP derived from four eddy covariance (EC) towers located at different ecosystems representative of the study area. Next, GPP time series simulated by both models are combined to optimize rooting depth at the four sites: different values of rooting depth are tested and the one that results in the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) between the two GPP series is selected. Explained variance and relative RMSE between Biome-BGC and EC GPP series are respectively augmented between 3 and 14 percentage points (pp) and reduced between 1 and 33pp. Finally the methodology is extrapolated for the whole study area and an original rooting depth map for peninsular Spain, which is coherent with the spatial distribution of vegetation type and GPP in the study area, is obtained at 1-km spatial resolution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available