4.5 Article

Global Change: a Public Health Researcher's Ethical Responsibility

Journal

CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH REPORTS
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages 160-166

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s40572-019-00238-4

Keywords

Global change; Climate change; Planetary health; Biodiversity; Public health; Ethics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of ReviewLoss of biodiversity and globalized environmental degradation result in planetary-scale changes which impact human societies.Recent FindingsThis paper highlights the urgency for public health researchers to integrate a global change perspective into their daily work. The public health community needs to answer several questions, e.g., how to weight the health of present and future generations; how to balance between the possible immediate adverse impacts of mitigating climate change vs long-term adverse impacts of global change; how to limit the environmental impacts of public health intervention; and how to allocate resources. Public health practitioners are faced with a moral responsibility to address these challenges.SummaryKey elements to ensure long-lasting, innovative global change and health solutions include (i) empowering the population; (ii) tailoring the framing of global change and health impacts for different stakeholders; (iii) adopting less conservative approaches on reporting future scenarios; (iv) increasing accountability about the health impacts of mitigation and adaptation strategies; and (v) recognizing the limits of science.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available