4.6 Review

Edible flowers: A review of the nutritional, antioxidant, antimicrobial properties and effects on human health

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Volume 60, Issue -, Pages 38-50

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2017.03.017

Keywords

Edible flowers; Brassica oleracea; Viola x wittrockiana; Rose spp.; Food composition data; Food analysis; Antioxidant and antimicrobial properties; Minerals; Phenolic acids; Flavonoids

Funding

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, Portugal) [SFRH/BD/95853/2013]
  2. FCT/MEC [FCT UID/QUI/00062/2013, UID/QUI/50006/2013 - POCI/01/0145/FEDER/007265]
  3. Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, Portugal)
  4. FEDER [UID/AGR/00690/2013]
  5. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, Portugal) [SFRH/BD/95853/2013]
  6. FCT/MEC [FCT UID/QUI/00062/2013, UID/QUI/50006/2013 - POCI/01/0145/FEDER/007265]
  7. Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, Portugal)
  8. FEDER [UID/AGR/00690/2013]
  9. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [UID/QUI/00062/2013] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Edible flowers have been traditionally used for human consumption in various cultures. They improve the appearance, taste and aesthetic value of food, aspects that consumers appreciate, justifying the increasing trend of fresh top quality flowers' sales worldwide. However, consumers also demand foods with beneficial health properties, in addition to the nutrients they contain, looking for functional qualities such as antioxidant and antimicrobial properties. This review summarizes the data of more than 100 studies performed until now on edible flowers, focusing on nutritional, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities, as well as health effects. This review provides valuable information on edible flowers in order to better characterize them and to increase their popularization among the food industry and consumers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available