3.8 Proceedings Paper

A Framework for Policy Information Popularity Prediction in New Media

Publisher

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/isi.2019.8823415

Keywords

feature extraction and analysis; policy informatics; policy information popularity prediction; popularity prediction model

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016QY02D0305]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61671450, 71621002]
  3. Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [ZDRW-XH-2017-3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the rapid development and wide application of new media, predicting the popularity of policy information on new media is of great significance for understanding and managing public opinion. However, the complexity of the diffusion patterns of policy information has brought great challenges for predicting the popularity of such information. Inspired by the methods of popularity prediction for short text information from social networks, we propose a framework for the popularity prediction of policy information. In our framework, first, the features of policy information are extracted from three dimensions: contextual information, social information and textual information. Then, effective features, such as the topic distribution, popularity competition intensity and hot information relevance, are identified by empirical analysis. Finally, the effective features are input into the prediction model to predict the popularity of policy information. We evaluate the performance of our proposed framework using a real-world dataset and the experimental results show that the framework can efficiently predict the popularity of policy information and that the features that we used are effective in improving the accuracy of policy information popularity prediction. The accurate prediction result could benefit policy makers, allowing them to make better decisions, understand and manage public opinion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available