3.8 Proceedings Paper

Botnet Detection on TCP Traffic Using Supervised Machine Learning

Journal

HYBRID ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, HAIS 2019
Volume 11734, Issue -, Pages 444-455

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29859-3_38

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Leon [01]
  2. INCIBE (Spanish National Cybersecurity Institute) [01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The increase of botnet presence on the Internet has made it necessary to detect their activity in order to prevent them to attack and spread over the Internet. The main methods to detect botnets are traffic classifiers and sinkhole servers, which are special servers designed as a trap for botnets. However, sinkholes also receive non-malicious automatic online traffic and therefore they also need to use traffic classifiers. For these reasons, we have created two new datasets to evaluate classifiers: the TCP-Int dataset, built from publicly available TCP Internet traces of normal traffic and of three botnets, Kelihos, Miuref and Sality; and the TCP-Sink dataset based on traffic from a private sinkhole server with traces of the Conficker botnet and of automatic normal traffic. We used the two datasets to test four well-known Machine Learning classifiers: Decision Tree, k-Nearest Neighbours, Support Vector Machine and Naive Bayes. On the TCP-Int dataset, we used the F1 score to measure the capability to identify the type of traffic, i.e., if the trace is normal or from one of the three considered botnets, while on the TCP-Sink we used ROC curves and the corresponding AUC score since it only presents two classes: non-malicious or botnet traffic. The best performance was achieved by Decision Tree, with a 0.99 F1 score and a 0.99 AUC score on the TCP-Int and the TCP-Sink datasets respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available