4.5 Review

Genetic conflicts: the usual suspects and beyond

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 220, Issue 1, Pages 6-17

Publisher

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.148148

Keywords

Red Queen; Antagonism; Mutualism; Toxin-antitoxin; Meiosis; Mitochondria; Wolbachia; Host-pathogen

Categories

Funding

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute postdoctoral fellowship of the Helen Hay Whitney Foundation
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences at the National Institutes of Health [K99/R00, 1K99GM112941, R01GM074108]
  3. Mathers Foundation
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [P50GM107632, K99GM112941, R00GM112941, R01GM074108] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Selfishness is pervasive and manifests at all scales of biology, from societies, to individuals, to genetic elements within a genome. The relentless struggle to seek evolutionary advantages drives perpetual cycles of adaptation and counter-adaptation, commonly referred to as Red Queen interactions. In this review, we explore insights gleaned from molecular and genetic studies of such genetic conflicts, both extrinsic (between genomes) and intrinsic (within genomes or cells). We argue that many different characteristics of selfish genetic elements can be distilled into two types of advantages: an over-replication advantage (e.g. mobile genetic elements in genomes) and a transmission distortion advantage (e.g. meiotic drivers in populations). These two general categories may help classify disparate types of selfish genetic elements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available