4.5 Article

Determining forward speed from accelerometer jiggle in aquatic environments

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 221, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.170449

Keywords

High sample rate noise; Energetic costs; Flow noise; Tag jiggle; Biologging

Categories

Funding

  1. US Navy's Living Marine Resources Program
  2. Office of Naval Research Marine Mammal Program
  3. American Cetacean Society Monterey and San Francisco Bay chapters
  4. Meyers Trust
  5. Stanford University's Anne T. and Robert M. Bass Fellowship
  6. Office of Naval Research's Young Investigator Award [N00014-16-1-2477]
  7. National Science Foundation Integrative Organismal Systems award [1656691]
  8. Office of Polar Programs Antarctic Organisms and Ecosystems award [1644209]
  9. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  10. Direct For Biological Sciences [1656691] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

How fast animals move is critical to understanding their energetic requirements, locomotor capacity and foraging performance, yet current methods for measuring speed via animal-attached devices are not universally applicable. Here, we present and evaluate a new method that relates forward speed to the stochastic motion of biologging devices as tag jiggle, the amplitude of the tag vibrations as measured by high sample rate accelerometers, increases exponentially with increasing speed. We successfully tested this method in a flow tank using two types of biologging devices and in situ on wild cetaceans spanning similar to 3 to >20 m in length using two types of suction cup-attached tag and two types of dart-attached tag. This technique provides some advantages over other approaches for determining speed as it is device-orientation independent and relies only on a pressure sensor and a high sample rate accelerometer, sensors that are nearly universal across biologging device types.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available