4.6 Article

Reducing chemical exposures at home: opportunities for action

Journal

JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH
Volume 71, Issue 9, Pages 937-940

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jech-2016-208676

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) [R00ES019881, T32ES007069]
  2. charitable donations to Silent Spring Institute
  3. Cedar Tree Foundation
  4. Passport Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Indoor environments can influence human environmental chemical exposures and, ultimately, public health. Furniture, electronics, personal care and cleaning products, floor coverings and other consumer products contain chemicals that can end up in the indoor air and settled dust. Consumer product chemicals such as phthalates, phenols, flame retardants and per-and polyfluorinated alkyl substances are widely detected in the US general population, including vulnerable populations, and are associated with adverse health effects such as reproductive and endocrine toxicity. We discuss the implications of our recent meta-analysis describing the patterns of chemical exposures and the ubiquity of multiple chemicals in indoor environments. To reduce the likelihood of exposures to these toxic chemicals, we then discuss approaches for exposure mitigation: targeting individual behaviour change, household maintenance and purchasing decisions, consumer advocacy and corporate responsibility in consumer markets, and regulatory action via state/federal policies. There is a need to further develop evidence-based strategies for chemical exposure reduction in each of these areas, given the multi-factorial nature of the problem. Further identifying those at greatest risk; understanding the individual, household and community factors that influence indoor chemical exposures; and developing options for mitigation may substantially improve individuals' exposures and health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available