4.3 Article

The influence of deoxynivalenol and zearalenone on steroid hormone production by porcine ovarian granulosa cells in vitro

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/03601234.2017.1356175

Keywords

Deoxynivalenol; zearalenone; steroid hormones; ovarian granulosa cells

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic [VEGA, 1/0039/16, KEGA 011SPU-4/2016]
  2. Slovak Research and Development Agency [APVV-0304-12]
  3. APVV bilateral project [SK-FR-2015-0009]
  4. European Community under project: Building Research Centre, AgroBioTech [26220220180]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fusarium mycotoxins deoxynivalenol (DON) and zearalenone (ZEA) are frequently occurring in feed of pigs together. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible in vitro effects of DON and ZEA, alone or their combination on steroid secretion of porcine ovarian granulosa cells (GCs). A species-specific model with porcine ovarian GCs was used to study the potential endocrine disrupting effects of DON and ZEA alone and in co-exposure. Progesterone (P4) and estradiol (E2) were determined by radioimmunoassay (RIA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The results of this study demonstrate that DON alone at the higher concentrations may act to stimulate P4 (at 1,000, 2,000, 3,000 and 5,000 ng mL(-1) but not 10 and 100 ng mL(-1)) and E2 (at 2,000, 3,000 and 5,000 ng mL(-1) but not 10, 100 and 1000 ng mL(-1)) secretion. The effects of ZEA on P4 and E2 secretion were not confirmed. DON in combination with the other fusariotoxin ZEA may impair steroidogenesis. Results aslo demonstrate different toxicological effects of fusariotoxins on follicle stimulating hormone-induced secretion of P4 and E2. All these results taken together suggest that fusariotoxin and their interactions can impact ovarian steroidogenesis, thereby demonstrating their potential reproductive effects in pigs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available