3.8 Proceedings Paper

Driving in the Fog: Latency Measurement, Modeling, and Optimization of LTE-based Fog Computing for Smart Vehicles

Publisher

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/sahcn.2019.8824922

Keywords

Fog computing; LTE; cloud computing; connected vehicle; low-latency; measurement study

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019KFYXJJS180]
  2. NSF [IIP-1822071, CNS-1409172, CNS-1563655, CNS-1731164]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fog computing has been advocated as an enabling technology for computationally intensive services in connected smart vehicles. Most existing works focus on analyzing and optimizing the queueing and workload processing latencies, ignoring the fact that the access latency between vehicles and fog/cloud servers can sometimes dominate the end-to-end service latency. This motivates the work in this paper, where we report a five-month urban measurement study of the wireless access latency between a connected vehicle and a fog computing system supported by commercially available multi-operator LTE networks. We propose AdaptiveFog, a novel framework for autonomous and dynamic switching between different LTE operators that implement fog/cloud infrastructure. The main objective here is to maximize the service confidence level, defined as the probability that the tolerable latency threshold for each supported type of service can be guaranteed. AdaptiveFog has been implemented on a smart phone app, running on a moving vehicle. The app periodically measures the round-trip time between the vehicle and fog/cloud servers. An empirical spatial statistic model is established to characterize the spatial variation of the latency across the main driving routes of the city. To quantify the performance difference between different LTE networks, we introduce the weighted Kantorovich-Rubinstein (K-R) distance. An optimal policy is derived for the vehicle to dynamically switch between LTE operators' networks while driving. Extensive analysis and simulation are performed based on our latency measurement dataset. Our results show that AdaptiveFog achieves around 30% and 50% improvement in the confidence level of fog and cloud latency, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available