4.4 Article

Temporal changes in radiocesium deposition in various forest stands following the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY
Volume 166, Issue -, Pages 449-457

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.04.016

Keywords

Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident; Cesium-137; Forest environment; Canopy interception; Transfer

Funding

  1. FMWSE (Fukushima Radiation Monitoring of Water, Soil and Entrainment) of MEXT (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, JAPAN)
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24110006, 24110001, 16K16201, 15H00969, 17H06070, 16H01791] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we investigated the transfer of canopy-intercepted radiocesium to the forest floor following the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. The Cs-137 content of throughfall, stemflow, and litterfall were monitored in two coniferous stands (plantations of Japanese cedar) and a deciduous mixed broad-leaved forest stand (oak with red pine) from July 2011 to December 2012. The forest floor of cedar stands had received higher levels of additional Cs-137 deposition compared with the mixed broad-leaved stand during the sampling period. The cumulative Cs-137 deposition during the study period was 119 kBq m(-2) for the mature cedar stand, 105 kBq m(-2) for the young cedar stand, and 41.5 kBq m(-2) for the broadleaved stand. The deposition of Cs-137 to the forest floor occurred mainly in throughfall during the first rainy season, from July to September 2011 (<200 d after the initial fallout); thereafter, the transfer of 137Cs from the canopy to forest floor occurred mainly through litterfall. A double exponential field-loss model, which was used to simulate the removal of Cs-137 from canopies, was the best fit for the temporal changes in the canopy Cs-137 inventory. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available