4.4 Article

Estimating Total Nitrogen and Phosphorus Losses in a Data-Poor Ethiopian Catchment

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages 1519-1527

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2017.05.0202

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Netherlands Fellowship Programme (Nuffic)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Selecting a suitable model for a water quality study depends on the objectives, the characteristics of the study area, and the availability, appropriateness, and quality of data. In areas where in-stream chemical and hydrological data are limited but where estimates of nutrient loads are needed to guide management, it is necessary to apply more generalized models that make few assumptions about underlying processes. This paper presents the selection and application of a model to estimate total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) loads in two semiarid and adjacent catchments exposed to pollution risk in north-central Ethiopia. Using specific criteria to assess model suitability resulted in the use of the Pollution Load (PLOAD) model. The model relies on estimates of nutrient loads from point sources such as industries and export coefficients of land use, and it is calibrated using measured TN and TP loads from the catchments. The performance of the calibrated PLOAD model was increased, reducing the sum of errors by 89 and 5% for the TN and TP loads, respectively. The results were validated using independent field data. Next, two scenarios were evaluated: (i) use of riparian buffer strips, and (ii) enhanced treatment of industrial effluents. The model estimated that combined use of the two scenarios could reduce TN and TP loads by nearly 50%. Our modeling is particularly useful for initial characterization of nutrient pollution in catchments. With careful calibration and validation, PLOAD model can serve an important role in planning industrial and agricultural development in data-poor areas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available