4.1 Article

The role of tacstd-2 level in hepatitis C patients (controlled clinical research)

Journal

LIBYAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19932820.2019.1622363

Keywords

Hepatitis B; Tacstd2; Liver

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hepatitis C virus is one of the leading causes of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The tumor-associated calcium signal transducer 2 (Tacstd-2) molecule is thought to be involved in the expression of a number of molecules that facilitate transport of hepatitis C into the cell. The aim of this study was to investigate Tacstd-2 concentrations in hepatitis C patients, with and without cirrhosis, and compare with uninfected controls. Sixty-one hepatitis C patients and twenty-nine control (hepatitis C antibody negative patients with dyspeptic complaints) cases were recruited between 2014 and 2016. Tacstd-2 concentrations in all hepatitis C and control patients were measured and compared. In addition, cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic hepatitis C patients were compared in terms of Tacstd-2 concentration, and comparison was made between patients with high and low concentrations of Tacstd-2. The mean Tacstd-2 concentration of patients with Hepatitis C was 691.2 +/- 473.3 ng/U was significantly higher (p = 0.043) than in the healthy control group (524 +/- 290.1 ng/U). Although the Tacstd-2 value was higher in cirrhotic than the non-cirrhotic patient group, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.78). Liver transferase concentrations were higher in hepatitis C patients with a Tacstd-2 concentration <500 ng/U compared to those with a Tacstd-2 concentration >500 ng/U. In patients with hepatitis C, Tacstd-2 level was detected at higher serum concentrations than healthy individuals. The introduction of hepatitis C virus into the cell can be relatively easy in people with a higher serum concentration of Tacstd-2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available