4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Assessing the feasibility of two hybrid MBR systems using PAC for removing macro and micropollutants

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 203, Issue -, Pages 831-837

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.03.023

Keywords

Organic micropollutants; Activated carbon; MBR; Adsorption; Membrane

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through DEMAGUA [A-03637899]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through HOLSIA [CTM2013-46750-R]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Education and Science through RedNovedar [CTQ2014-51693-REDC]
  4. FEDER [GRC2013-032, AGRU2015/02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The removal of 10 organic micropollutants (OMPs) was studied in two MBRs using different types of membrane (flat sheet microfiltration, MF, and hollow fiber ultrafiltration, UF) operated under aerobic conditions with direct dosing of powdered activated carbon (PAC) in the mixed liquor. In both reactors high COD degradation and nitrification were achieved (>95%), while nitrate removal was only observed after PAC addition. The adsorbent improved the operation of both systems (sludge properties and microbial diversity) which resulted in an enhancement of the quality of the final effluent. The operation with both types of membrane was feasible being the UF system slightly better in terms of the quality of the final effluent. The strategy of 250 mg/L of PAC additions every 35 days was validated according to the results obtained for the removal of the most recalcitrant OMPs, such as diclofenac and carbamazepine. Concerning the type of membrane, only significant differences were observed for diclofenac and roxithromycin, which were better removed in the UF configuration. These differences were attributed to sorption and/or further biotransformation processes occurring in the cake layer. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available