4.7 Article

Protected area coverage of threatened vertebrates and ecoregions in Peru: Comparison of communal, private and state reserves

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 202, Issue -, Pages 12-20

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.023

Keywords

IUCN red list; Conservation; Local initiatives; Private reserves; Community conservation

Funding

  1. Neotropical Primate Conservation
  2. Sociedad Peruana de Derecho Ambiental

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protected areas (PAs) are a conservation mainstay and arguably the most effective conservation strategy for species protection. As a 'megadiverse' country, Peru is a priority for conservation actions. Peruvian legislation allows for the creation of state PM and private/communal PAs. Using publicly available species distribution and protected area data sets we evaluated the coverage of Threatened terrestrial vertebrate species distributions and ecoregions provided by both kinds of PA in Peru. Peru's state PA system covers 217,879 km(2) and private/communal PAs cover 16,588 km2. Of the 462 species of Threatened and Data Deficient species we evaluated, 75% had distributions that overlapped with at least one PA but only 53% had >= 10% of their distributions within PM, with inclusion much reduced at higher coverage targets. Of the species we evaluated, 118 species are only found in national PAs and 29 species only found in private/communal PAs. Of the 17 terrestrial ecoregions found in Peru all are represented in PAs; the national PA system included coverage of 16 and private/communal PAs protect 13. One ecoregion is only protected in private/communal PM, whereas four are only covered in national PM. Our results show the important role private/communal PAs can play in the protection of ecological diversity. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available