4.0 Article

Laboratory Rearing of Pepper Weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Using Artificial Leaf Balls and a Boll Weevil Diet

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENTOMOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 52, Issue 4, Pages 395-410

Publisher

GEORGIA ENTOMOLOGICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.18474/JES15-43.1

Keywords

Anthonomus eugenii; laboratory rearing

Categories

Funding

  1. pepper growers of Miami-Dade Co., FL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The pepper weevil, Anthonomus eugenii Cano (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), is the most economically important insect pest of peppers. Management studies for A. eugenii require a large and readily available supply of the insects. Our objective was to develop a rearing method for A. eugenii in the laboratory using 1.5-cm diameter glass balls covered with pepper leaves and Parafilm (R) M (American National Can, Greenwich, CT). Adults collected from either field or laboratory colonies were equally suitable for initiating colonies or for use in experiments. Glass balls with a layer of pepper leaves covered with parafilm provided an effective substrate for obtaining eggs and larvae when maintained at 26 +/- 2 degrees C, 60 +/- 20% relative humidity, and at a 14: 10 h (L: D) photoperiod. Under these conditions, the highest egg production from colonies using leaf balls and supplemental nourishment was obtained from mature, untreated pepper leaves. Mean (+/- SE) durations of the pre-oviposition, oviposition, and post-oviposition periods were 2.9 (+/- 1.2) d, 32.3 (+/- 4.3) d, and 34.0 (+/- 11.6) d, respectively. Females produced 54.3 +/- 4.3 eggs over their adult lifespan of 59.8 +/- 4.9 d; male adult longevity was 80.3 +/- 5.9 d. Maximum numbers of eggs or larvae were removed from the leaf balls 4-12 d after adults were introduced. Either a small brush or a sieve with water proved to be equally effective for separating A. eugenii eggs from the leaf balls. We also successfully reared A. eugenii on a diet originally developed for boll weevils, Anthonomus grandis Boheman.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available