4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Adsorption kinetics and optimum conditions for Cr(VI) removal by activated carbon prepared from luffa sponge

Journal

DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT
Volume 57, Issue 17, Pages 7763-7772

Publisher

DESALINATION PUBL
DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2015.1015453

Keywords

Luffa sponge; AC; Cr(VI); Adsorption

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M551950]
  2. Promotive research fund for excellent young and middle-aged scientists of Shandong Province [BS2014HZ019]
  3. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment [2012ZX07203004, 2015ZX07203005]
  4. Open Research Fund Program of Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Eco-Environmental Science for Yellow River Delta (Binzhou University) [2013KFJJ01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Activated carbon (AC) prepared from luffa sponge was firstly used as an adsorbent to remove Cr(VI) from aqueous solution. The Cr(VI) adsorption behaviors of AC under different conditions, including initial Cr(VI) concentration, quantity of AC, solution pH, and temperature were investigated. The optimal conditions for adsorption of Cr(VI) by AC were pH = 1, initial Cr(VI) concentration = 80 mg/L, T = 303 K, and AC content = 1.6 g/L. The adsorption kinetics could be described by the pseudo-second-order model. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy was used to investigate the sorption mechanism. Some functional groups such as C-O and O-H were formed on the carbon surface, which could then react with Cr(VI). The surface structure of AC before and after adsorption was analyzed by scanning electronic microscopy. Adsorbed ions choked some of the pores in AC after adsorption. The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller surface area and average pore size of the AC were 834.13 m(2)/g and 5.17 nm, respectively. The maximum adsorption of Cr(VI) by AC was 149.06 mg/g, which makes AC prepared from luffa sponge promising for removing Cr(VI) from wastewater.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available