4.5 Article

Analysis of Scanned Probe Images for Magnetic Focusing in Graphene

Journal

JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC MATERIALS
Volume 46, Issue 7, Pages 3837-3841

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11664-017-5350-y

Keywords

Scanning probe microscopy theory; ballistic transport; graphene; simulation; magnetic focusing; electron trajectories

Funding

  1. U.S. DOE Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division [DE-FG02-07ER46422]
  2. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-13-1-0211]
  3. National Science Foundation under NSF [ECCS-1541959l]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have used cooled scanning probe microscopy (SPM) to study electron motion in nanoscale devices. The charged tip of the microscope was raster-scanned at constant height above the surface as the conductance of the device was measured. The image charge scatters electrons away, changing the path of electrons through the sample. Using this technique, we imaged cyclotron orbits that flow between two narrow contacts in the magnetic focusing regime for ballistic hBN-graphene-hBN devices. We present herein an analysis of our magnetic focusing imaging results based on the effects of the tip-created charge density dip on the motion of ballistic electrons. The density dip locally reduces the Fermi energy, creating a force that pushes electrons away from the tip. When the tip is above the cyclotron orbit, electrons are deflected away from the receiving contact, creating an image by reducing the transmission between contacts. The data and our analysis suggest that the graphene edge is rather rough, and electrons scattering off the edge bounce in random directions. However, when the tip is close to the edge, it can enhance transmission by bouncing electrons away from the edge, toward the receiving contact. Our results demonstrate that cooled SPM is a promising tool to investigate the motion of electrons in ballistic graphene devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available