4.2 Article

Predicting personalized process-outcome associations in psychotherapy using machine learning approaches-A demonstration

Journal

PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 300-309

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2019.1597994

Keywords

personalized mental health; nearest neighbor; alliance-outcome research; within; and between-patients effects; longitudinal data; moderators of alliance-outcome association

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation [LU 660/10-1, LU 660/8-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Personalized treatment methods have shown great promise in efficacy studies across many fields of medicine and mental health. Little is known, however, about their utility in process-outcome research. This study is the first to apply personalized treatment methods in the field of process-outcome research, as demonstrated based on the alliance-outcome association. Method: Using a sample of 741 patients, individual regressions were fitted to estimate within-patient effects of the alliance-outcome association. The Boruta algorithm was used to identify patient intake characteristics that moderate the within-patient alliance-outcome association. The nearest neighbor approach was used to identify patients whose relevant pretreatment characteristics were similar to those of a target patient. The alliance-outcome associations of the most similar patients were subsequently used to predict the alliance-outcome association of the target patient. Results: Irrespective of the number of selected nearest neighbors, the correlation between the observed and predicted alliance-outcome associations was low and insignificant. According to the true error of the prediction, the demonstrated approach was unable to improve predictions made with a simple comparison model. Conclusion: The study demonstrated the application of personalized treatment methods in process-outcome research and opens many new paths for future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available