Journal
SCIENTIA AGRICOLA
Volume 77, Issue 1, Pages -Publisher
UNIV SAO PAOLO
DOI: 10.1590/1678-992X-2017-0430
Keywords
Free Brazilian Repository for Open Soil Data; PronaSolos; Pedometrics; soil data recovery; digital soil mapping
Categories
Funding
- Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
- Ministerio da Educacao do Brasil, through the Programa Nacional de Pos Doutorado (PNPD/CAPES)
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq), Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia, Inovacoes e Comunicacoes [310247/2015-2, 142492/2014-0]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Spatial soil data applications require sound geospatial data including coordinates and a coordinate reference system. However, when it comes to legacy soil data we frequently find them to be missing or incorrect. This paper assesses the quality of the geospatial data of legacy soil observations in Brazil, and evaluates geospatial data sources (survey reports, maps, spatial data infrastructures, web mapping services) and expert knowledge as a means to fix inconsistencies. The analyses included several consistency checks performed on 6,195 observations from the Brazilian Soil Information System. The positional accuracy of geospatial data sources was estimated so as to obtain an indication of the quality for fixing inconsistencies. The coordinates of 20 soil observations, estimated using the web mapping service, were validated with the true coordinates measured in the field. Overall, inconsistencies of different types and magnitudes were found in half of the observations, causing mild to severe misplacements. The involuntary substitution of symbols and numeric characters with similar appearance when recording geospatial data was the most common typing mistake. Among the geospatial data sources, the web mapping service was the most useful, due to operational advantages and lower positional error (similar to 6 m). However, the quality of the description of the observation location controls the accuracy of estimated coordinates. Thus, the error of coordinates estimated using the web mapping service ranged between 30 and 1000 m. This is equivalent to coordinates measured from arc-seconds to arc-minutes, respectively. Under this scenario, the feedback from soil survey experts is crucial to improving the quality of geospatial data.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available