4.7 Article

Highly efficient electrocatalytic oxidation of nitrite by electrodeposition of Au nanoparticles on molybdenum sulfide and multi-walled carbon nanotubes

Journal

JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 786, Issue -, Pages 43-49

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2017.01.007

Keywords

Molybdenum sulfide; Multi-walled carbon nanotubes; Au nanopartides; Nitrite; Electrocatalytic oxidation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21307104]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20150451]
  3. Natural science fund for colleges and universities in Jiangsu Province [14KJB180025]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A molybdenum sulfide/multi-walled carbon nanotubes/gold nanocomposite (MoS2-MWCNTs-Au) modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE) was developed via a hydrothermal synthesis followed by an electrochemical deposition of gold nanopartides onto the surface of GCE. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM) images indicated the MoS2 worked as the substrate for MWCNTs and the gold nanoparticles were grown on the MoS2-MWCNTs. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) results showed the MoS2-MWCNTs-Au modified GCE exhibited the best electrochemical activity in a 0.1 M phosphate buffered saline (PBS) compared to the MoS2 and MoS2-MWCNTs modified GCE. Both CV and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) results indicated the MoS2-MWCNTs-Au had excellent electrocatalytic ability to oxide nitrite in a pH 5.0 PBS. Quantitative analysis of nitrite was carried out using amperometric i-t method. The amperometric response displayed the MoS2-MWCNTs-Au modified GCE could be used to determine nitrite concentration in a wide linear range of 12 and 6500 mu M with a detection limit of 4.0 mu M. The proposed sensor also showed good anti-interference and real sample analysis properties. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available