4.7 Article

Freestanding MnO2 nanoflakes on carbon nanotube covered nickel foam as a 3D binder-free supercapacitor electrode with high performance

Journal

JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 786, Issue -, Pages 35-42

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2017.01.005

Keywords

Manganese dioxide; Dip & dry; Carbon nanotube; Hydrothermal; Supercapacitor

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21503055]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M571390]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China [QC2015015]
  4. Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Fund [LBHZ14054, LBH-TZ0609]
  5. Major Project of Science and Technology of Heilongjiang Province [GA14A101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Designing and fabricating self-supported and binder-free MnO2 nanostructure electrode to overcome their low conductivity for supercapacitor application with high comprehensive electrochemical performance, such as high capacitance, excellent stability, and good rate capability, is still a tremendous challenge. In this paper, carbon nanotubes are uniform covered on nickel foam (denote as CNT/Ni) by a simple dip & dry method to form a 3D skeleton for MnO2 nanosheets deposition (denoted as MnO2-CNT/Ni). Results show the MnO2-CNT/Ni electrode exhibits a unique 3D porous interconnected network with a high specific capacitance of 402.5 Fg(-1), at 1 Ag-1 and a favorable cycling performance that 83% capacitance retained after 5000 cycles at a current density of 2 Ag-1. Meanwhile, the MnO2-CNT/Ni//CNT/Ni asymmetric supercapacitor exhibits an excellent energy density of 25 Wh kg(-1) at a power density of 0.9 kW kg(-1) with 853% capacitance retention after 5000 cycles. Therefore, such a facile and manageable method to prepare MnO2 electrode with high supercapacitor performance is offering a promising future for practical applications. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available