4.5 Article

Seismic Vulnerability Analysis of RC Bridges Based on Kriging Model

Journal

JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 242-260

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2017.1323040

Keywords

Vulnerability Analysis; Monte Carlo Simulation; Kriging Model; Latin Hypercube Simulation; RC Bridges

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51508276]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M570399]
  3. Open Research Fund for Key laboratory of Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Structure of Ministry of Education [CPCSME2014-02]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [30915011329]
  5. Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds [1401090C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a Kriging model-based method for seismic vulnerability analysis of reinforced concrete (RC) bridges. It aims at reducing the computational effect when the Monte Carlo technique is used for establishing the structural vulnerability curves. The general procedure of the proposed method is put forward firstly. In the procedure, the uncertainties existing in the structures and ground motions are both taken into account, and the uniform design (UD) technique is adopted for generating the random samples. The reliability of the proposed method is demonstrated by the vulnerability analysis of an single degree of freedom (SDOF) system using the Latin hypercube simulation (LHS) method. Vulnerability analysis of an RC bridge system is then carried out using the proposed method. The vulnerability curves of the bridge obtained by the Kriging model-based method are compared with those obtained by the LHS method. Additionally, three simulation schemes adopting different UD tables are employed to investigate the convergence and stability of the proposed method. The results show that the proposed method used for the seismic vulnerability analysis of RC bridges can reduce the computational effort and time to a large extent without much compromise on the accuracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available