Journal
JOURNAL OF EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL DISORDERS
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 195-208Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1063426619870492
Keywords
peer aggression; bystander intervention; moral judgments; social-emotional factors; retribution; adolescence
Funding
- National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice [2016-R2-CX-0056]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study investigates how social-emotional factors are related to bystanders' responses to aggression and possible retaliation. Participants consisted of sixth and ninth graders (N = 896, 52.8% female) who indicated how likely they would be to intervene if they observed an initial aggressive act and then following retaliation. Hierarchical regression models were used to examine social-emotional predictors of bystander judgments and responses. Findings highlight that participants with high effortful control and transgressor justice sensitivity were more likely to evaluate bystander intervention as more acceptable. Furthermore, youth with higher affective empathy, sympathy, and observer justice sensitivity were more likely to report that they would engage in active bystander responses, whereas youth with higher negative affect and rejection sensitivity were more likely to report that they would engage in inactive responses to aggression. These findings have important implications for understanding how individual differences in social-emotional factors relate to bystander attitudes and responses to initial aggressive acts and to possible retribution.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available