4.1 Article

How do they measure up? Differences in stakeholder perceptions of quality measures used in English community nursing

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 142-150

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1355819619868506

Keywords

clinical commissioning groups; community care; nurses; quality indicators

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) HSDR Programme [HSDR 12/209/02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives To establish how quality indicators used in English community nursing are selected and applied, and their perceived usefulness to service users, commissioners and service providers. Methods A qualitative multi-site case study was conducted with five commissioning organizations and their service providers. Participants included commissioners, provider organization managers, nurses and service users. Results Indicator selection and application often entail complex processes influenced by wider health system and cross-organizational factors. All participants felt that current indicators, while useful for accountability and management purposes, fail to reflect the true quality of community nursing care and may sometimes indirectly compromise care. Conclusions Valuable resources may be better used for comprehensive system redesign, to ensure that patient, carer and nurse priorities are given equivalence with those of other stakeholders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available