4.3 Article

Predicting the 6-mon thrisk of severe hypoglycemia among adults with diabetes: Development and external validation of a prediction model

Journal

JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND ITS COMPLICATIONS
Volume 31, Issue 7, Pages 1158-1163

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.04.004

Keywords

Diabetes mellitus; Hypoglycemia; Prediction model; Risk factors; Electronic health records

Funding

  1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [R01HS022963, R01HS019859]
  2. National Institute for Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [1K23DK099237-01, P30DK092924]
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH
  4. Amarin Corporation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: To develop and externally validate a prediction model for the 6-month risk of a severe hypoglycemic event among individuals with pharmacologically treated diabetes. Methods: The development cohort consisted of 31,674 Kaiser Permanente Colorado members with pharmacologically treated diabetes (2007-2015). The validation cohorts consisted of 38,764 Kaiser Permanente Northwest members and 12,035 HealthPartners members. Variables were chosen that would be available in electronic health records. We developed 16-variable and 6-variable models, using a Cox counting model process that allows for the inclusion of multiple 6-month observation periods per person. Results: Across the three cohorts, there were 850,992 6-month observation periods, and 10,448 periods with at least one severe hypoglycemic event. The six-variable model contained age, diabetes type, HgbA1c, eGFR, history of a hypoglycemic event in the prior year, and insulin use. Both prediction models performed well, with good calibration and c-statistics of 0.84 and 0.81 for the 16-variable and 6-variable models, respectively. In the external validation cohorts, the c-statistics were 0.80-0.84. Conclusions: We developed and validated two prediction models for predicting the 6-month risk of hypoglycemia. The 16-variable model had slightly better performance than the 6-variable model, but in some practice settings, use of the simpler model may be preferred. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available