3.9 Article

Biofilm Formation and Virulence Determinants of Klebsiella oxytoca Clinical Isolates from Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER
Volume 51, Issue 3, Pages 855-860

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12029-019-00317-7

Keywords

Klebsiella oxytoca; Biofilm formation; Drug resistance; Colorectal cancer

Funding

  1. University of Al-Qadisiyah, College of Science [Iq 2018-334e]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Biofilm formation has made the therapy of bacterial infections more difficult. The objective our study was assessment of pan-drug-resistant (PDR) Klebsiella oxytoca pathogenicity and virulence factors causing AAHC in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Materials and Methods Among a total of 300 healthy and 300 patients with antibiotic-associated hemorrhagic colitis (AAHC) and CRC, 200 K. oxytoca were identified during May 2015-January 2019. The virulence properties and biofilm formation among the isolates were investigated by phenotypic, PCR, and real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) techniques. Results The bla(CTX-M1) (20%), bla(SHV) (11%), bla(TEM1) (33%), and AmpC encoding CIT (2%) ESBL genes, carbapenemase-encoding genes blaIM (4%) and bla(OXA-48) (2%), and colistin-resistant mcr-1 gene (2.5%) were detected. The virulence-encoding genes including fimA (80%), pilQ (100%), matB (100%), mrkA (80%), and npsB (100%) were amplified. Therefore, PDR K. oxytoca containing adhesins and toxin-encoding genes with ability of biofilm formation causing AAHC and CRC were isolated. There was a significant difference between healthy and patients with CRC regarding the presence of K. oxytoca (p = 00.221). Conclusion Bacterial enteric pathogens possibly play a role in CRC. Biofilm formation by K. oxytoca strains prevents the efficient infection elimination; therefore, rapid identification and control measure are chief requirements. Additionally, more investigations are necessary with this regard.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available