4.7 Article

Evaluating the regional social sustainability contribution of public-private partnerships in China: The development of an indicator system

Journal

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 259-278

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sd.2001

Keywords

analytic hierarchy process (AHP); people-oriented urbanization; public-private partnerships (PPPs); social sustainability; social sustainability contribution evaluation system (SSCES) for PPPs

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71671042, 71472037]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  3. Program for Outstanding Young Teachers of Southeast University [2242015R30009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Public-private partnerships (PPPs) have been increasingly adopted in China. Sustainability of PPPs has become a priority for a sustainable development of PPPs. Most prior studies focus on sustainable implementation of PPP projects. Few research efforts have been done to examine the impacts of PPPs to sustainability from an external perspective and a more macro geographical scale. Meanwhile, the social aspect of the sustainability of PPPs has not been widely studied. Therefore, this study aims to propose a social sustainability contribution evaluation system (SSCES) for PPPs to evaluate PPPs' contribution to regional social sustainability at the institutional level. An indicator system of the SSCES for PPPs was developed, which included 8 requirements for socially sustainable development and 33 social sustainability indicators. The weights of indicators were determined by using the analytic hierarchy process method. The results indicate that, in the context of China, promoting people-oriented urbanization in PPPs can help enhance regional social sustainability. This study provides a useful evaluation tool for various stakeholders to evaluate the sustainability of PPPs from an institutional level, especially for local governments to review current PPP polices and make improvements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available