4.7 Article

Rapid Bacterial Detection during Endodontic Treatment

Journal

JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages 626-632

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0022034517691723

Keywords

biofilms; microscopy; diagnostic systems; endodontics; bacteria; fluorescence

Funding

  1. EPSRC CASE Studentship
  2. Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1256813] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bacteria present in the root canal (RC) space following an RC treatment (RCT) can lead to persistent infections, resulting in treatment failure and the need for reintervention or extraction. Currently, there are no standardized methods in use to clinically detect bacterial presence within RC spaces. The use of paper point sampling and fluorescence staining was shown to be a rapid method, able to detect residual bacteria following treatment. The study demonstrated that Calcein acetoxymethyl (AM) proved to be a suitable dye for detecting vital bacteria within mature endodontic biofilms, with an improved sensitivity over colony-forming unit counting in a stressed biofilm model. Furthermore, in a clinical trial with primary RCTs, 53 infected teeth were sampled in vivo, and increased detection of vital cells was found when compared with colony-forming unit counting, highlighting the sensitivity of the technique in detecting low cell numbers. By combining fluorescent staining and microspectroscopy with software-based spectral analysis, successful detection of vital cells from RCs was possible after 5 min of Calcein AM incubation. Application of this technology during RCT has the potential to reduce persistent infections through vital cell detection and additional treatment. Furthermore, this technique could be applied to antimicrobial research and disinfection control in clinical settings (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03055975).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available