Journal
SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY
Volume 101, Issue 1, Pages 107-120Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12745
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective This article documents dehumanization in the 2016 presidential contest. Methods Using a mixed-method approach, I analyze dehumanized portrayals of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in visual campaign rhetoric and on common survey measures of dehumanization. Results Images from the campaign discourse reflect animalistic and mechanistic dehumanization of the presidential candidates. The survey data reveal that voters dehumanize opposition candidates and party members in both subtle and blatant ways that also reflect this animalistic-mechanistic distinction. Conclusion The findings affirm the external validity of measurement strategies for dehumanization by showing the correspondence between campaign imagery and common survey-based measurement tools. This work situates dehumanization as a psychological process relevant to the study of campaigns and elections.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available