4.3 Article

Quality of life and mood in children with cystic fibrosis: Associations with sleep quality

Journal

JOURNAL OF CYSTIC FIBROSIS
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages 811-820

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2017.11.021

Keywords

Sleep; Mood; Quality of life; Children

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Clinical Research Postgraduate Scholarship [GNT1093728]
  2. Royal Australasian College of Physicians ResMed/Sleep Health Foundation Research Entry Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We aimed to investigate the relationship between sleep quality, mood and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in children with CF and controls. Methods: Children (7-12 years) and adolescents (13-18 years) with CF and controls completed sleep evaluation: overnight oximetry and 14 days of actigraphy. Age-appropriate questionnaires assessed mood (Children's Depression Inventory; CDI or Beck's Depression Inventory), HRQOL (CF Questionnaire-Revised; CFQ-R or PedsQL), and sleepiness (Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale). Results: 87 CF and 55 controls recruited. Children with CF had poorer sleep quality, more sleepiness and lower mood than controls, with a negative correlation between mood score and sleep efficiency. Sleepiness score was predictive of mood score and multiple CFQ-R domains. Adolescents with CF also demonstrated poorer sleep and more sleepiness than controls, but no difference in mood. Reduced sleep quality predicted lower CFQ-R scores. No correlation between sleep, mood or HRQOL in controls. Conclusions: In children and adolescents with CF, impaired sleep quality is associated with lower mood and HRQOL in an age-specific manner. Future research will aid understanding of effective strategies for prevention and treatment of mood disorders and sleep disturbance in children with CF. Crown Copyright (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Cystic Fibrosis Society. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available