4.5 Article

Effect of neuromuscular stimulation and individualized rehabilitation on muscle strength in Intensive Care Unit survivors: A randomized trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE
Volume 40, Issue -, Pages 76-82

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.03.014

Keywords

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation; Post-ICU rehabilitation; Critical illness; Physiotherapy; Muscle strength

Funding

  1. Special Account for Research Grants of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens [70/3/10279, 70/3/8064]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Intensive Care Unit (ICU) survivors experience muscle weakness leading to restrictions in functional ability. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been an alternative to exercise in critically ill patients. The aim of our study was to investigate its effects along with individualized rehabilitation on muscle strength of ICU survivors. Material and methods: Following ICU discharge, 128 patients (age: 53 +/- 16 years) were randomly assigned to daily NMES sessions and individualized rehabilitation (NMES group) or to control group. Muscle strength was assessed by the Medical Research Council ( MRC) score and hand grip at hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were functional ability and hospital length of stay. Results: MRC, handgrip, functional status and hospital length of stay did not differ at hospital discharge between groups (p > 0.05). Delta MRC% one and two weeks after ICU discharge tended to be higher in NMES group, while it was significant higher in NMES group of patients with ICU-acquired weakness at two weeks (p = 0.05). Conclusions: NMES and personalized physiotherapy in ICU survivors did not result in greater improvement of muscle strength and functional status at hospital discharge. However, in patients with ICU-aw NMES may be effective. The potential benefits of rehabilitation strategies should be explored in larger number of patients in future studies. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available