Journal
JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE
Volume 39, Issue -, Pages 108-114Publisher
W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.12.014
Keywords
Critical care; Renal replacement therapy; Renal function; Mortality
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Purpose: The optimal timing for the initiation of early continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is uncertain and requires a practically feasible definition with acceptable evidence. Materials and methods: We investigated the clinical impacts of 3-time interval parameters on the morbidity and mortality of 177 patients with septic shock-induced acute kidney injury: (1) time from vasopressor initiation to CRRT initiation (Tvaso-CRRT), (2) time from intensive care unit (ICU) admission to CRRT initation (TICU-CRRT), and (3) time from endotracheal intubation to CRRT initiation (Tendo-CRRT). Results: The proportion of the patients with Tvaso-CRRT less than 24 h (median, 14 h, interquartile range [ IQR], 5-30 h) was significantly higher in the survival group than in the non-survival group (84.3% vs. 58.5%, p < 0.001). Tvaso-CRRT less than 24 h and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score were independent factors associated with 28-day mortality and 90-day mortality. TICU-CRRT (median, 17 h, IQR, 5-72 h) and Tendo-CRRT (median, 13 h, IQR, 4-48 h) were significantly correlated with both the length of ICU stay (p < 0.001) and mechanical ventilation duration (p b 0.001), but not mortality. Conclusions: Considering the possible therapeutic measurement by physician on the basis of the results in this study, early CRRT could be defined by a Tvaso-CRRT less than 24 h. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available