4.6 Article

Enhanced paper-based ELISA for simultaneous EVs/exosome isolation and detection using streptavidin agarose-based immobilization

Journal

ANALYST
Volume 145, Issue 1, Pages 157-164

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9an01140d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [NRF-2017M3A7B4049851]
  2. Human Resources Program in Energy Technology of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) from the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea [20174010201620]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017M3A7B4049851] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

EVs/exosomes are considered as the next generation of biomarkers, including for liquid biopsies. Consequently, the quantification of EVs/exosomes is crucial for facilitating EV/exosome research and applications. Paper-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (p-ELISA) is a portable diagnostic system with low cost that is simple and easy to use; however, it shows low sensitivity and linearity. In this study, we develop p-ELISA for targeting EVs/exosomes by using streptavidin agarose resin-based immobilization (SARBI). This method reduces assay preparation times, provides strong binding, and retains good sensitivity and linearity. The time required for the total assay, including preparation steps and surface immobilization, was shortened to similar to 2 h. We evaluated SARBI p-ELISA systems with/without CD63 capture Ab and then with fetal bovine serum (FBS) and EVs/exosome-depleted fetal bovine serum (dFBS). The results provide evidence supporting the selective capture ability of SARBI p-ELISA. We obtain semiquantitative p-ELISA results using an exosome standard (ES) and human serum (HS), with R-2 values of 0.95 and 0.92, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available