4.5 Article

Calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor: An updated analysis of 339 cases reported in the literature

Journal

JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
Volume 45, Issue 8, Pages 1117-1123

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.05.007

Keywords

Calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumor; Pindborg tumor; Intraosseous; Extraosseous; Clinical features; Recurrence rate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The aim of this study was to integrate the available data published on calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumors (CEOT) into a comprehensive analysis of its clinical and radiologic features. Materials and methods: An electronic search was undertaken in May 2016. Eligibility criteria were publications having enough clinical, radiological and/or histological information to confirm definite diagnosis. Results: A total of 362 lesions were found, 339 with enough information were analyzed. Variants clear cells (n = 33) and Langerhans cells (n = 10) were rarely described in the literature, as well as lesions with malignant transformation (n = 8). Central lesions (n = 264) were more prevalent than their peripheral counterparts (n = 24). A higher prevalence characterized the mandible, posterior region, and third and fourth decades. About 40% of the peripheral lesions showed signs of underlying bone erosion, and about half of the central ones showed signs of cortical bone perforation. Recurrence was found in all lesions (12.6%), peripheral lesions (18.8%), central lesions (11.6%), clear cell (10.7%), Langerhans cell (0%), and those with malignant transformation (42.9%). Excision or curettage was associated with the highest recurrence rate. None of the variables showed a statistically significant influence on the recurrence rate. Conclusions: The possible locally aggressive behavior of the lesions recommends a less conservative management than simple curettage. The clear cell variant shows similar demographic data and biological behavior compared to the non-variant lesions, suggesting that the presence of clear cells does not have an important clinical significance. (C) 2017 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available