4.6 Article

Consistency relations in effective field theory

Journal

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/06/042

Keywords

modified gravity; power spectrum; redshift surveys

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L000652/1]
  2. European Research Council under the European Union [308082]
  3. STFC [ST/L000652/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [308082] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L000652/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The consistency relations in large scale structure relate the lower-order correlation functions with their higher-order counterparts. They are direct outcome of the underlying symmetries of a dynamical system and can be tested using data from future surveys such as Euclid. Using techniques from standard perturbation theory (SPT), previous studies of consistency relation have concentrated on continuity-momentum (Euler)-Poisson system of an ideal fluid. We investigate the consistency relations in effective field theory (EFT) which adjusts the SPT predictions to account for the departure from the ideal fluid description on small scales. We provide detailed results for the 3D density contrast 6 as well as the scaled divergence of velocity theta. Assuming a ACDM background cosmology, we find the correction to SPT results becomes important at k greater than or similar to 0.05h/Mpc and that the suppression from EFT to SPT results that scales as square of the wave number k, can reach 40% of the total at k approximate to 0.25h/Mpc at z = 0. We have also investigated whether effective field theory corrections to models of primordial non-Gaussianity can alter the squeezed limit behaviour, finding the results to be rather insensitive to these counterterms. In addition, we present the EFT corrections to the squeezed limit of the bispectrum in redshift space which may be of interest for tests of theories of modified gravity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available