4.6 Article

Constraints on vacuum energy from structure formation and Nucleosynthesis

Journal

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/03/021

Keywords

big bang nucleosynthesis; dark energy theory; stars

Funding

  1. JT Foundation [ID55112]
  2. Bahnson Trust Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper derives an upper limit on the density rho(Lambda) of dark energy based on the requirement that cosmological structure forms before being frozen out by the eventual acceleration of the universe. By allowing for variations in both the cosmological parameters and the strength of gravity, the resulting constraint is a generalization of previous limits. The specific parameters under consideration include the amplitude Q of the primordial density fluctuations, the Planck mass M-pl, the baryon-to-photon ratio eta, and the density ratio Omega(M) / Omega(b). In addition to structure formation, we use considerations from stellar structure and Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) to constrain these quantities. The resulting upper limit on the dimensionless density of dark energy becomes rho(Lambda) / M-pl(4) < 10(-90), which is similar to 30 orders of magnitude larger than the value in our universe rho(Lambda) / M-pl(4) similar to 10(-120). This new limit is much less restrictive than previous constraints because additional parameters are allowed to vary. With these generalizations, a much wider range of universes can develop cosmic structure and support observers. To constrain the constituent parameters, new BBN calculations are carried out in the regime where eta and G = M-pl(-2) are much larger than in our universe. If the BBN epoch were to process all of the protons into heavier elements, no hydrogen would be left behind to make water, and the universe would not be viable. However, our results show that some hydrogen is always left over, even under conditions of extremely large eta and G, so that a wide range of alternate universes are potentially habitable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available