4.8 Article

Rigidity of polymer micelles affects interactions with tumor cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
Volume 257, Issue -, Pages 40-50

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.12.013

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Israel Science Foundation [0394883]
  2. FP7 Marie Curie CIG grant [0305116]
  3. Edith C. Blum Foundation [0364801]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Controlling the interaction of drug delivery systems (DDS) with tissues is critical for the success of therapies. Specifically in cancer, due to the high density of the tumors, tissue penetration of DDS is critical and may be challenging. In previous work we have shown that Solidified Polymer Micelles (SPMs) rapidly internalize into cells and tissues. Using AFM analysis, in the present work we measured differences in rigidity of SPM compared with Wet PolymerMicelles (WPM). We further examined whether the semi-solid form of hydrated SPMs has an effect on the interaction with tumor cells both in mono-layer systems and in multi-layer clusters of cells as spheroids. For that we have performed detailed characterization of SPM compared to WPM, including examinations of particle size, stability, drug release kinetics and cell transcytosis, inmelanoma A-375 cells. Cell uptake measurements were done using fluorescent signal analysis, FACS and microscopy imaging, showing enhanced abilities of SPMs to penetrate cells and tissues. A simple physical model is presented that well agrees with the experiments and provides insight about the role of particle rigidity in the engulfment mechanism. We conclude that particle rigidity enhances cellular uptake and tissue penetration and that SPMs have a promising potential as an effective and highly permeable DDS. Our findings can be important in future rational design of DDS for particle adjustment to specific tissues and pathologies. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available