4.8 Review

Animal models for evaluation of oral delivery of biopharmaceuticals

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
Volume 268, Issue -, Pages 57-71

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.09.025

Keywords

Peptides; Proteins; Insulin; In situ perfusion; In vivo; Macromolecules

Funding

  1. Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking from European Union's Seventh Framework Programme [115363]
  2. EFPIA
  3. Danish Research Council for Technology and Production (FTP) [DFF-4004-00120B]
  4. Danmarks Grundforskningsfonds [DNRF122]
  5. Villum Fonden [00009301] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biopharmaceuticals are increasingly important for patients and the pharmaceutical industry due to their ability to treat and, in some cases, even cure chronic and potentially life-threatening diseases. Most biopharmaceuticals are administered by injection, but intensive focus on development of systems for oral delivery of biopharmaceuticals may result in new treatment modalities to increase the patient compliance and reduce product cost. In the preclinical development phase, use of experimental animal models is essential for evaluation of new formulation designs. In general, the limited oral bioavailability of biopharmaceuticals, of just a few percent, is expected, and therefore, the animal models and the experimental settings must be chosen with utmost care. More knowledge and focus on this topic is highly needed, despite experience from the numerous studies evaluating animal models for oral drug delivery of small molecule drugs. This review highlights and discusses pros and cons of the most currently used animal models and settings. Additionally, it also looks into the influence of anesthetics and sampling methods for evaluation of drug delivery systems for oral delivery of biopharmaceuticals primarily with examples on insulin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available